Home Page
Progressive News
Health Care & Wellness
Media & The Blogs
National Issues
Candidates & Causes
Poverty & Economics
Environment & Science
Education & Opportunity
Equality Rights & Issues
International Issues
Rants & Raves

About us
Who We Are
Community Guidelines
Getting Started
Formatting Tips
Contact Us

Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Pam's House Blend
Our Future
The EPI Blog
New Deal 2.0
Beat the Press
The Stars Hollow Gazette
Firefly Dreaming

Progressive Issues for Progressive Democrats
"Health care is a fundamental right." (Ted Kennedy, 8/26/08)
* * * * * * *
The Progressive Platform Project

Paul Ryan

False Equivalency Takedown: Social Security and Medicare vs. Grover Norquist

by: Michael Conrad

Tue Dec 20, 2011 at 21:52:07 PM EST

FYI: This was written before I read that PolitiFact had decided to label an accurate claim its "lie of the year." It seems Paul Ryan's "contact PolitiFact and tell them to give me an intellectual bailout" lobbying campaign paid off for him. For more on this, see Brian Beutler, Dean Baker, and Paul Krugman.

I won't be backing down on this one bit and I seriously doubt anyone else will be either. Truth doesn't change just because PolitFact, in all of its posturing glory, wishes it would.

Original post

The usual suspects, still pining for a Beltway "Grand Bargain" -- a bad solution that focuses on the wrong problem -- are reliant on a false equivalency. Their line goes something like this: Social Security and Medicare supporters like the NCPSSM (National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare) and the Strenghten Social Security coalition are no different than Grover Norquist.

To turn a popular phrase at the moment, this is a DC drone's idea of what a thoughtful person sounds like. Whether the person giving voice to this "analysis" actually believes it or they're repeating it as a testament to their own Seriousness, they're out of their depth in a kiddie pool.  

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 828 words in story)

Class Warfarce

by: Michael Conrad

Mon Sep 26, 2011 at 11:37:08 AM EST

Republicans continue their coordinated effort to label the Buffet Rule that President Obama introduced last week "class warfare." This predictable line of attack is worthy of derision. Paul Krugman, Jared Bernstein, and Rebecca Thiess have the details.

The laughable assertion that things like the Buffet Rule constitute "class warfare" is a useful example of how the GOP operates. The Republican response to the president's mainstream proposal should be a catalyst for a broader Democratic realization that we shouldn't let baseless accusations of "class warfare" deter us from making accurate contrasts that resonate broadly. The right's "class warfare" charge is both inevitable and eminently beatable.

There's More... :: (3 Comments, 500 words in story)

Ryan fixes Medicare like Mafia fixes Informers

by: funluvn1

Sun Apr 17, 2011 at 06:21:36 AM EST

Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times has a very introspective and informative column that I would ask each of you to take the time to peruse.  His pièce de résistance?  This quote.

Ryan is right when he suggests that his plan would "fix" Medicare; it's the same way that the Mafia "fixes" an informer. In both cases the solution guarantees that the target won't be around to create trouble anymore, and as long as you don't feel remorse about collateral damage you're home free.

Alan Grayson had it straight up correct when he said ""If you get sick in America, this is what the Republicans want you to do: If you get sick America, the Republican health care plan is this: Die quickly. "That's right, the Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick."

There's More... :: (2 Comments, 742 words in story)

Principles, Lines in the Sand, and What's at Stake

by: priceman

Wed Apr 06, 2011 at 22:21:29 PM EST

(Cross posted in orange where it's dying.)

In case some were wondering, it's not enough for one to say he has principles; especially "I have principles" followed with a qualifier. The acknowledgment of one's principles have to be earned by standing by them otherwise they don't really exist. Principled stances are theoretical lines in the sand. Even though there may be more than 1, there is a line too far where one cannot move the goal post anymore and then claim a principled 1st down. At that point, one cannot breach that line without that breach turning into an unprincipled one.   You see, it's not enough to support a Democrat when that said Democrat doesn't adhere to the Democratic Party Platform. It's also not enough to say you care about Medicare when you don't even admonish those in power that call it an entitlement program.

This kind of framing does not garner support for Medicare and framing matters; ask Drew Westen who predicted the 2010 outcome years before it happened. And no, Medicare's problems mostly stem from  privatization and our other fully privatized system suckling off of it through Medicare Advantage. There was also its precursor in the deal president Clinton made with Republicans in the balanced budget act of 1997 which cut and privatized Medicare partially leading to Medicare Advantage which is 9% less efficient than your grandfather's Medicare.

There's More... :: (16 Comments, 663 words in story)

True Blue November: Week In Review

by: Michael Conrad

Sun Oct 24, 2010 at 15:18:00 PM EST

10 days to go.  
There's More... :: (3 Comments, 1691 words in story)
Front Page Feed:
New here?
Make a New Account

Have an account?
Log in:



Forget your username or password?

A stirring tale of how progressives built America and lessons on creating the next Big Change Moment, from OpenLeft's Mike Lux.

"As inspiring as it is informative." -Arianna Huffington

"Mike is that rarest breed: a populist insider." -Wes Boyd

"Better than an OpenLeft flame war." -Chris Bowers


Advanced Search
Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Progressive Blue
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Since 02/29/2008
Powered by: SoapBlox